Centre for Nature Recovery
Fellow Nathalie Seddon to co-direct Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery
Date Published: 31.03.2026
A new interdisciplinary study co-authored by our Senior Research Fellow, Kam Bhui, highlights how water management and environmental change may be shaping mental health around the Great Salt Lake in Utah, USA.
'Association between Great Salt Lake desiccation, air quality, and major depressive episodes: an ecological study', published in The Lancet Planetary Health finds that declining water levels in Utah’s Great Salt Lake are associated with worsening air quality and higher prevalence of major depressive episodes in surrounding communities.
The NASA-funded research, led by Dr Maheshwari Neelam at the Universities Space Research Association’s (USRA) Science and Technology Institute in collaboration with the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Oxford, shows that a combination of long-term water diversion, overconsumption, and changing environmental conditions has reduced lake levels and exposed large areas of lakebed. These exposed surfaces act as a source of fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), which is transported into nearby population centres.
The study identifies a new linked sequence of processes: declining lake levels expose sediments, wind-driven dust increases air pollution, and repeated exposure to elevated PM₂.₅, which was associated with higher depression levels, based on data from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
While the study identifies strong associations it does not establish direct causation at the individual level. However, it did show a dose-response relationship, whereby the frequency and intensity of days of exposure to PM₂.₅, corresponded with an increase in the prevalence of depressive symptoms in local communities. These findings are consistent with existing biological evidence showing that fine particulate matter can affect brain function through inflammatory pathways.
“Depression is a disabling condition with profound individual and societal consequences. It is already one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and is projected to become the largest disease burden by 2030,” said Professor Kam Bhui, co-author, Senior Research Fellow at Wadham, and psychiatrist at the University of Oxford, whose work is supported by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley. He added:
Understanding how environmental exposures, including degraded water systems and poor air quality, interact with mental health is critical for prevention and policy. Environmental risks rarely occur in isolation. What matters for mental health is often the accumulation of exposures over time, interacting with social vulnerability, pre-existing health conditions, and unequal access to protection. That is why these findings are important - they point us toward a more integrated understanding of public health.”
“Our findings show that the desiccation of the Great Salt Lake is not just an environmental issue—it is a growing public health challenge,” said lead author Dr Neelam. “We need to start having difficult but necessary conversations about water management. Prioritizing short-term economic gains through water diversion while compromising ecosystem stability is a risky and ultimately unsustainable path. Protecting water systems is closely tied to protecting human health and regional resilience.”
This work builds on decades of research across fragmented fields, where studies have typically examined one exposure and one outcome in isolation. By integrating hydrology, atmospheric science, and psychiatry, the study connects these pieces into a broader chain of events - from water management decisions to environmental change, to air quality, and ultimately to human health outcomes.
“The relationship between environmental exposure and depression is complex, with pre-existing conditions and multiple interacting social, biological, and environmental factors shaping outcomes rather than any single linear pathway,” Dr Neelam said. “This highlights the need for continued research—particularly studies that integrate environmental, remote sensing, and health data—to better understand cumulative and potentially lagged effects on human health.”
As human-induced changes to hydrologic systems continue, the findings suggest that the consequences extend beyond ecosystems and infrastructure to population well-being. Protecting and restoring water systems, alongside broader blue and green spaces, may therefore represent an important component of long-term public health strategy. More broadly, the study underscores the need to consider environmental change and public health as interconnected systems requiring coordinated approaches across science, policy, and communities.
Fellow Nathalie Seddon to co-direct Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery
Nature-based Solutions Initiative, creates online, interactive Effectiveness Evidence Tool.